A critical step within a systematic review is to assess each individual study for risk of bias. This is known as critical appraisal, quality assessment or risk of bias assessment. The purpose of the assessment is to validate the quality and relevance of each included study.
Key appraisal considerations include:
Rigorous and standardised appraisal of each included study is conducted after the full text screening stage. Appraisal can occur simultaneously with data extraction.
Appraisal process:
Pilot your preferred tool(s) - Two reviewers should pilot a few studies to ensure that the tool is comprehensive enough for all aspects of the included studies and to identify any differences in understanding of the tool before proceeding.
Document the appraisal process - In the protocol, include which tools you intend to use, how many reviewers, if tools will be piloted and any cut off scores or inclusion/exclusion parameters that will be taken into account during the appraisal process. If these decisions are impacted by the screening process, changes must be noted and justified in your manuscript.
Can l exclude studies at the appraisal stage?
Both PRISMA and the Cochrane Handbook have sections outlining requirements for the critical appraisal of studies as part of a systematic review.
Note: it is important to remember that once you have completed your systematic review others may appraise your work. Keep in mind the critical appraisal criteria for systematic reviews while conducting your own review to ensure it is of high quality.
Monash Health acknowledges the Traditional Custodians of the land, the Wurundjeri and Boonwurrung peoples, and we pay our respects to them, their culture and their Elders past, present and future.
We are committed to creating a safe and welcoming environment that embraces all backgrounds, cultures, sexualities, genders and abilities.